Posted: September 29th, 2022

8 pts

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

I have “country project analysis” already finished it, but i have missed a lot of points because I did not follow all the requirements. so, I need someone to re-write it and add the missing requirements the needed to be added.
She sent me this>>”””If you rewrite you paper according to the requirements and turn it in. I will grade it over the weekend. Otherwise, the score remains as above.”
type paper in APA style
the requirement are
Country Analysis Assignment: Part A
This is Part A of the Country Analysis Project for BUS 366: International Business. This is an individual project, typed in APA style.
Select two countries (neither one can be the United States). These two countries will be the countries you use throughout all three parts of the project. All submissions must clearly mark which question is being answered, if not clear, question will be marked as incomplete (zero = 0 points), and must be in APA style, inclusive of references/bibliography/citations. The “Culture” and “Ethics” parts listed below must be done for both countries.
Please answer the questions below for Part A and turn in to The Assignment Drop Box by the due date (see Weekly Schedule Download Weekly Schedule). Then copy your upload to The Discussion Thread, so you can share the results of your research with the class. Only by submitting the same Word file to BOTH drop boxes will you earn points. Only uploading it in one place earns a zero for not following instructions.
This Project is worth 37 points. I will run the submissions through an anti-plagiarism software. Failure to reference the websites or any other research will result in a grade reduction of 3 points in your project score.
Please include the tables provided by the websites! Failure to do so will result in half the points being subtracted from your grade.
Since this is an individual project. Please place your name inside the file as a header. Naming structure for the file should be:
Student’sFullName – Country Analysis Part A – MM/DD/YY.doc or .docx
This makes it easier/faster for me to grade and causes less confusion for you in the future. Failure to do this may result in 5 points being subtracted from your grade.
I have included the grading rubric. Please refer to this rubric. This is included to aid you in completing this part of the project.
PLEASE NOTE: The countries you choose for Part A will be the countries you analyze for Parts B and C. If, for some reason, information is not available for your countries at the websites cited by a particular question, please choose other countries to answer the questions.
Culture: (24 points total)
Using the tools at https://hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/, (Links to an external site.)CHOOSE TWO countries (neither one can be the USA) and COMPARE them among only the four HOFSTEDE dimensions presented on the website and in class.
Provide the following:
a short explanation of each dimension, (4 points)
an explanation of how the dimension applies to both countries, (8 points).
highlight how each Hofstede dimension can contribute to or discourage business corruption, (4 points)
apply this insight for each of your two countries, (8 points)
Ethics: (13 points total)
Go to Transparency International, https://www.transparency.org/country (Links to an external site.)and compare your two countries’ Corruption Perception Index scores (see Question 1), with that of the USA. Why or why not is your country’s score lower than that of the USA?
Provide the following:
A brief explanation of how the Corruption Perception Index is created, including what a high score is and what a low score is, (2 points)
Country 1’s score compared with the score of the USA, (2 points)
Country 2’s score compared with the score of the USA, (2 points)
A brief explanation as to why your countries’ scores are different than the USA’s score, (2 points)
Compare and Contrast the perceived corruption levels in your countries with the Hofstede scores from the previous, (5 points)
Country Project Part A Rubric
Student’s Name:
Country 1/A:
Country 2/B:
1. Culture
Possible
Points
Short Explanation of Each Cultural Dimension
a. Power Distance (PD)
1
a. Individualism (IND)
1
a. Masculinity (MAS)
1
a. Uncertainty Avoidance (UA)
1
b. How PD applies to Country A
1
b. How PD applies to Country B
1
b. How IND applies to Country A
1
b. How IND applies to Country B
1
b. How MAS applies to Country A
1
b. How MAS applies to Country B
1
b. How UA applies to Country A
1
b. How UA applies to Country B
1
Highlight how each Hofstede dimension can contribute to or discourage business corruption.
4
Apply this insight for each of your two countries
8
Total Culture
24
2. Ethics
a. A Brief Explanation of the Corruption Perception Index (CPI)
2
b. Country 1’s Score compared with the USA’s score
2
c. Country 2’s Score compared with the USA’s score
2
d. Why are Country 1’s and Country 2’s scores different from USA
2
e. Compare and Contrast the perceived corruption levels in your countries with the Hofstede scores from the previous section.
5
Total Ethics
13
Total Part A
37
DEDUCTIONS:
Failure to type paper in APA style
-5
Failure to reference at end of paper and/or failure to reference in APA style
-3
Failure to insert tables in the appropriate location(s)
-3
Failure to follow exact order of required items and/or clearly enumerate them
-5
Failure to have a cover page
-1
Failure to submit before due date and/or failure to submit in both, Discussions AND Assignments drop boxes
ZERO FOR ASSIGNMENT
Failure to follow exact naming structure of file
-1
Turn-It-In Similarity Score 50%-60%
-4
Turn-It-In Similarity Score 60%-70%
-8
Turn-It-In Similarity Score 70%-80%
-12
Turn-It-In Similarity Score 80%-90%
-16
Turn-It-In Similarity > 90%
-20
Country Analysis Discussion: Part A
CriteriaRatingsPts
File naming structure
0 pts
No Marks
0 pts
See Comments for Issues
Comments
-5 / 0 pts
Country 1/A
0 pts
No Marks
0 pts
See Comments for Issues
Comments
0 / 0 pts
Country 2/B
0 pts
No Marks
0 pts
See Comments for Issues
0 / 0 pts
PD
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
1 / 1 pts
IND
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
1 / 1 pts
MAS
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
1 / 1 pts
UA
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
1 / 1 pts
How PD applies to Country A
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How PD applies to Country B
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How IND applies to Country A
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How IND applies to Country B
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How MAS applies to Country A
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How MAS applies to Country B
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How UA applies to Country A
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
How UA applies to Country B
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 1 pts
Highlight how each Hofstede dimension can contribute to or discourage business corruption
4 pts
Full Marks
2 pts
Some issues
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 4 pts
Apply this insight for each of your two countries
8 pts
Full Marks
4 pts
Some issues
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 8 pts
A Brief Explanation of the Corruption Perception Index (CPI)
2 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
Comments
2 / 2 pts
Country 1’s Score compared with the USA’s score
2 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
Comments
0 / 2 pts
Country 2’s Score compared with the USA’s score
2 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 2 pts
Why are Country 1’s and Country 2’s scores different from USA
2 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 2 pts
Compare and Contrast the perceived corruption levels in your countries with the Hofstede scores from the previous section
5 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
0 / 5 pts
DEDUCTIONS:
view longer description
0 pts
No loss of points
0 pts
Total points deducted in Comments
Comments
— / 0 pts

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now