Posted: September 7th, 2022

Do these employer statements constitute an unlawful threat in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the LMRA? Why or why not?

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Please read case study 5-8 on pages 259-260 in your text. When finished, please carefully and thoroughly answer the 6 questions at the end of the case. Be as thorough in your answers as possible, integrating information from your text, along with any outside research you engage in on this subject. Please prepare your answers in a Word document — when ready to submit, please click on the title of this link, then upload your completed Word document and submit following directions on the page!
Questions
1. Do these employer statements constitute an unlawful threat in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the LMRA? Why or why not?
2. Do the employer statements constitute an unlawful promise of benefits in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the act? Why or why not?
3. Did the questioning or statements by either supervisor Bates or supervisor Lofton constitute unlawful interrogation in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the act? Why or why not?
4. Should the NLRB give consideration to its “Totality of Conduct” doctrine in reaching a conclusion about the alleged violations in this case? Explain your answer.
5. Develop some guidelines for managers who may be talking with employees about the union during an organizing campaign.
6. How should the NLRB rule?

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now