Posted: May 23rd, 2022

Is it ethical for executive perquisites to continue if the company is facing financial problems or if objectives are not met ?

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

When companies are suffering financial problems, the question of continuing benefits or paying bonuses to executives becomes an issue. Sears: https://globalnews.ca/news/3598469/sears-canada-lay-offs-management-bonuses/
Postmedia: http://pressprogress.ca/after-closing-newspapers-and-laying-off-journalists-postmedia-executive-pay-hits-new-high-in-2017/
Postmedia: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/postmedia-losing-a-third-executive-paid-hefty-retention-bonus/article34539724/
Federal Government : https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/federal-public-servants-paid-171m-in-bonuses-for-2019-20-despite-departments-meeting-less-than-half-of-performance-objectives
Questions:
Is it ethical for executive perquisites to continue if the company is facing financial problems or if objectives are not met ?
Your assignment is to provide rationale both for and against the idea of continuing executive perquisites (benefits or bonus) when the company is having financial problems. (10 marks for your rationale “for” and 10 marks for your rationale “against”)
After providing rational both for and against, write a statement as to whether you agree with companies continuing perquisites or whether you disagree with it and why (what rationale you found most compelling). (5 marks)

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now