Posted: September 23rd, 2022
Whose’ logic is more convincing to you, why?
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
After watching the two opposing views of Thomas Friedman and Pankaj Ghemawat on the state of globalization, suggest your own opinion on the following questions.
Whose’ logic is more convincing to you, why?
Is globalization good or bad? What are the benefits and costs of globalization?
I believe that Pankaj’s words and advice is more convincing than Thomas Friedmans because his evidence is more lined up with logic and I do not agree that the earth is flat at all.
I believe that globalization is beneficial when it comes to lowering prices but it does involve environmental costs which affects the government. It also increases global costs world wide which ultimately causes taxes everywhere. Lastly it closes the gap between the cultural diversity and shortens the gaps between the classes.
Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.