Posted: September 20th, 2022

Yet scientists like raymond pearl and herbert spencer jennings publicly criticized eugenics and immigration restriction through their scientific experimental work.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

In the 1910s and 1920s, authors like Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard argued––using evidence from biological texts of the time period involving heredity, genetics, and eugenics––that the federal government should limit immigration to the United States based on racial science, in particular they advocated for restricting immigration to only those of so-called Anglo-Saxon descent. Yet scientists like Raymond Pearl and Herbert Spencer Jennings publicly criticized eugenics and immigration restriction through their scientific experimental work. Mezzano goes so far as to argue that their attack on eugenics was a quintessentially Progressive scientific move. In a two-page essay, present a critical summary of the argument and evidence that Mezzano presents in this article. In your summary, I would like to know if you agree or disagree with Mezzano’s argument (this will be your thesis). I would also like to know what evidence Mezzano uses to substantiate their claims, in particular the primary records produced by Grant, Stoddard, Pearl, and Jennings. Be sure to explain key terms Mezzano introduces, especially the Progressive Era, eugenics, and race science.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now